[Haizea] unmatching host CPU information between ONE and Haizea

[Shi Jin]

It looks like it is implemented here
lib/python/haizea/core/leases.py:
805     def __repr__(self):
 806         """Returns a string representation of the Capacity"""
 807         return "  |  ".join("%s: %i" % (res_type,q[0]) for res_type, q
in self.quantity.items())

only the first instance capacity quantity is output. Shouldn't we output the
sum of all quantities?

But this should not affect our scheduling, right? I need to look more to
figure out why haizea has stopped scheduling after the first lease.

Shi


On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Shi Jin <jinzishuai at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> I've set up Haizea-1.0 to work with ONE-1.4. Here is the output
> cloudadmin at frontend-dev var]$ onehost list;haizea-list-hosts
>   ID NAME                      RVM   TCPU   FCPU   ACPU    TMEM    FMEM
> STAT
>   16 node5                       1   1600   1594   1594 2467536 2256548
> on
>   17 node4                       7   1600   1600   1600 6598130 6220621
> on
>  ID   Hostname    CPUs    Mem
>  1    node5       100     24097.03125
>  2    node4       100     64434.8710938
>
> The two hosts each has 16 cores, theirfore OpenNebula report 1600 in TCPU.
> However, they both show up as 100 in Haizea, which means only 1 CPU, right?
> Is this a discrepancy? I also find out that I can only deploy a CPU=1 VM on
> each host, which seems to take the whole resources for Haizea point of view.
> Is there any thing wrong here?
>
> The memory seems to be consistent between ONE and Haizea.
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Shi Jin, Ph.D.
>
>


-- 
Shi Jin, Ph.D.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.cs.uchicago.edu/pipermail/haizea/attachments/20101014/d94f8dad/attachment.htm