<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
</head>
<body>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText">This is an announcement of Jonathan Baker's Dissertation Defense.<br>
===============================================<br>
Candidate: Jonathan Baker<br>
<br>
Date: Thursday, September 15, 2022<br>
<br>
Time: 12 pm CST<br>
<br>
Remote Location: <a href="https://uchicago.zoom.us/j/97698179037?pwd=Zit1a2hRTzh4cjJPTGdxRXptaEtLdz09">
https://uchicago.zoom.us/j/97698179037?pwd=Zit1a2hRTzh4cjJPTGdxRXptaEtLdz09</a><br>
<br>
<br>
Title: Architectural Design for Emerging Quantum Technologies<br>
<br>
Abstract: Despite its relative infancy, there are a number of emerging quantum technologies for quantum computation, and it is unclear which will be the clear winner. Evaluation of these technologies at the architectural level, far beyond the small-scale prototypes
of 1 to 2 qubits, is critical to producing viable systems capable of executing both near and long-term applications effectively. In order to fairly evaluate new hardware platforms, it is vital to develop technology-specific optimizations and compilation frameworks,
pushing hardware closer to its fundamental limits rather than being hindered by ineffective software. Ultimately, our goal is to decide whether or not proposed technologies are able to scale efficiently into the future. Central questions in platform evaluation
can be roughly categorized into three themes: 1. Does this technology support fast and economical program execution. 2 Can this technology produce consistent and high-quality program outputs? 3. Does this technology fit the requirements of practical applications
now and/or in the future?<br>
<br>
In this thesis, I explore the design, optimization, and evaluation of a variety of competing quantum technologies which are each vital when deciphering good candidates for scalable quantum computation, even in its very early stages. This manifests as several
case studies serving as examples of a much larger, fundamental architectural questions. First, we consider what are the right abstractions for a quantum computing system by exploring the use of multivalued quantum logic to better make use of hardware capabilities.
Second, we consider architectural trade-off spaces by considering neutral atom hardware. Third, we consider application-guided architectural design, evaluating how technology specific architectures can be designed to best fit target applications, like error
correction codes. We examine the use of localized memory to enable virtualization of error corrected logical qubits. Finally, we explore a variety of technology specific (and agnostic) compilation optimizations to push proposed architectures and hardwares
to their limits to best evaluate their ability to scale beyond prototypes and support large scale applications.<br>
<br>
Advisors: Fred Chong<br>
<br>
Committee Members: Fred Chong, Ken Brown, Ali Javadi-Abhari, and Hank Hoffmann<br>
<br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText"><br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</body>
</html>